Tag Archives: supreme personality

As it was in India – so it was the World over

Standard
Corinthia ,south of Athens, Greece painted in the wall of a ruin this picture strongly resembles the Cow tending flute playing Lord Krishna.

Corinthia ,south of Athens, Greece painted in the wall of a ruin this picture strongly resembles the Cow tending flute playing Lord Krishna.

HARI-VASU-ATMAN / KRISHNA-BALADEVA-PARAMATMAN is the Original Supreme Personality of Godhead.  Did you know that Lord Ananta-Baladeva, the Rig Vedic Cosmic Purusha Himself, once secretly Incarnated as the Great Physician CHARAKA to deliver ALL HUMANITY from birth, death disease and old age? 

In the Mediterranean Region Charaka  was prophetically worshiped as IASAS / YASHAS (YAHU-SHUA / JESUS) Asclepios of the Greeks, Aesculapius of the Romans, Osiris-Serapis of the Egyptians and Eshmun in Phonecia. He was the most well-known, loved and worshiped God of the entire Region for thousands of years.  Within 100 years of the Appearance of Jesus Christ, the worship of Charaka (Serapis, Iasas etc.) became the worship of the Cosmic Purusha and Great Physician Jesus Christ, whose Rig Vedic Self-Sacrifice “…takes away the sins of the World (Cosmos)”.

In the Mediterranean Region the Original Supreme Personality of Godhead, worshiped by the greatest ascetic saints, mystics, prophets, philosophers, scientists, artists, heroes and kings, was HERU-WASU-ATEN / ELI-YAHU-ADON / HELI-OS-ATOMOS (HARI-VASU-ATMAN) and on His Sacred BUCOLIC (GOKULA) LOTUS (NYMPHIA) ISLAND of RHODA, HE was worshiped exclusively as the Meghistos Kouros or Greatest Youth, KRISHNA! He was considered the ORIGIN of ALL of the (Purusha male, giver) Greek ‘Gods’ and His feminine receiver Prakriti Shekinah / Shakti RHODA (RADHA) was considered the ORIGIN of all of the Greek ‘Goddesses’! 

Sacred Poetry of Devotion

Standard

firebird

31 pages of Bhakti Ananda Goswami’s Poetry Dedicated to God and Goddess Who are Love Itself

https://www.dropbox.com/sh/zirffzl5pilflnk/8xJvl6lLKG

No Download Required

Who is Rhoda? Who is Zeus? Who is Kouros? Indra, Vishnu, a Demigod or God Himself?

Standard
Kouros

Kouros

Let us compare the degradation of the Primal Revelation in the Medi-Terranean (Middle Earth) Region to that of its degradation in Indian ‘Hinduism’. 

In india today, if I say ‘Indra’ to a ‘Hindu’ how many people will instantly think of Krishna-Vishnu as the Vedic Purusha manifest as Indra? How many will immediately remember Sri Krishna-Vishnu asserting that HE IS Indra in His Bhagavad-Gita? How many will think of the Pure Land Buddhist Doctrine that Avalokiteshvara (Vishnu) may appear as Indra, the King of ‘heaven’. How many will think of Indra as the King (Royal-Post-occupier) of our Material ‘heaven’ or cosmic manifestation? How many will first or only think of Indra as a bolt-throwing deva demigod or storm god? These different ideas of Indra represent stages of the devolution of Vedic-Vaishnava thought/realization, with a lusty fornicating bolt-throwing material storm-god as the last stage, the last remnant of identification with the entire previous tradition.

Notice the winged lighting-bolt (see etching of engraving below) Vajra of Zeus and Indra (and Tantric Buddhism) in this relief of Kouros and His Kouretes. There was an ancient confounding of the Chakra of Helios Kouros (Krishna-Vishnu) and the Vajra Lighting-bolt of Indra, Who is Zeus as FULGAR, the Wielder of the Lighting-bolt. Zeus and Jove (Jupiter, YA-Pitr, Father YAHU) are the Same Supreme Father God as Heru-Wasu-AHMUN in Egypt. The Greek Zeus, and Greco-Roman Theos, Dios and Deus are cognate with both the Sanskrit DEVA and Dyaus. As POLIEUS /PURUSHA Egyptian PER-AUSU, Zeus or Jupiter had hundreds and thousands of Holy Names, which were the Names that He was known by in every little home shrine and great Temple-City-State dedicated to Him in the ancient World. The important thing to understand is that now, the only ‘Zeus’ that commonly comes to mind is that of the late polytheist’s lusty ‘storm god’ lighting-bolt thrower of the late Greco-Roman mythologists and their modern commentators.

Read the rest of this entry

PART TWO: Christ Mass Advent Offering with Vaishnava References to the Theology of Baladeva the Second Person of the Godhead

Standard

 il_fullxfull.279830612 To Jesus Christ, the Second Self of God  To Jesus Christ, Zaos (Jiva) the Reservior of all living beings, Read the rest of this entry

Advaita Vedanta was originally Personal, Monotheistic & Centered on Love

Standard

Advaita Vedanta was originally Personal, affirming that the non-dual One is the Lord/God. Such Advaita is an aspect of Monotheism, that defines God as Omnipresent / All-Pervasive. The Omnipresence of the PERSON of the Holy Spirit / Paramatman is not experienced as a mere impersonal light, devoid of Consciousness and Personal attributes! A mere impersonal energy cannot love or experience love! Love is the symptom of the presence of a Person! LOVE IS THE DIFFERENCE Impersonal Brahman ‘Realization’ is NOT the same as experience of the Param-Atman or All-pervasive ATEN/ATUM/ADON-Yahu Feature of Heru-Wasu/Eli-Yahu/Helius/Hari-Vasu the Loving and Lovable Supreme Personality of Godhead!  Of course, as both a Vaishnava and a Catholic bhakta, my own realization is that mental and both subtle and gross forms of temporary and composite material nama-rupa only exist because transcendent and eternal Nama-Rupa exists, and that the advaita Brahman experience of the mayavadi impersonalist does not pass the ‘blinding’ barrier of the Brahma Jyoti, to directly, by His Own revelation, experience the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Who is the Source of the Brahma Jyoti and All spiritual and material realms and worlds.  Read the rest of this entry

Radha-Krishna-centric Vaishnavism as the Origin of Religion

Standard

In a nutshell, the original Buddhism is actually a form of Radha-Krishna-centric Vaishnavism.  It pre-dates the appearance of Sakyamuni by thousands of years, and was once the dominant Bhakti Tradition of major portions of the human family.  The historical and theological core of this Bhakti Buddhism has been called ‘Pure Land Buddhism’ by modern scholars.  This is taken from the title of one of the Traditions most important Scriptures, the SUKHAVATI VYUHA.

HARE KRISHNA !

SRI SRI GURU and Gauranga ki jaya !

Dearest Sandi and Jeffrey, Rachel and Vrin,

Please accept my affectionate obeisances.

This is still too complicated for the average reader, but i need to get this down somewhere in case i have to relocate (leave my body).  I am actually trying to keep it simple. I have had a second inquiry about Pure Land Buddhism recently, so reflecting on our conversation, Jeffrey, i decided to write something for you especially, as we discussed, a kind of introduction to Buddhism. I may also send some of it to the other devotee who inquired.

Attached is my first installation. Krishna willing, the structure will focus next on finishing the description of Nepalese-Tibetan Buddhism (cult of Tara, Tibetan Book of the Dead, lila forms of Lokesvara / Vishnu,  Mahadeva as AN EXPANSION OF LOKESVARA,  Maha kala as Nara Hari Rupa and YHVH worship at the PATALA, BUDH AS PTAH etc.)  Then i will focus on the origins of ‘Buddhism’ from Sakyamuni’s time, in Nepal and India.  I will show connections to the GOOD SHEPARD, SHALIGRAM / SHAL GROVE, TULASI and RADHA Traditions in Buddhist lore.  I will discuss how two schools of Buddhist iconography emerged (Gandharan and Mathuran )…both showing Greek Rhodian connections, and how the earliest Buddhist centers were all Vaishnava centers.  I will touch on the ‘Buddhism’ of Asoka, whose guru’s ashram of 10,000 was IN MATHURA, and how it is widely accepted by western scholars that Asoka’s Missionaries were present in Judea, Greece and Egypt. The Theravadins have appropriated Asoka, but there is NO evidence that his ‘Buddhism’ was Hinayana !   ALL the evidence is that originally Buddhism, both before AND AFTER SAKYAMUNI was at first indistinguishable from Krishna-centric Vaishnavism, except for the late and insignificant heretical Theravadins, who were suppressed by Asoka etc., and thus diffused to S. E. Asia through Sri Lanka.  Then i will describe how Vaishnava related M Buddhism spread to China Korea and Japan, and how voidism corrupted it as an ‘esoteric’ tradition associated with voidism and impersonalism in India (the pilgrim problem). Both Tantrism and Dhyana / Zen acted as vehicles for impersonalism all the way into Japan. I will touch-on Hanuman as the protector of Pure Land Buddhism throughout its northern range ( He is extremely popular in Chinese Buddhism) and i will explain that the worship of Krishna and Radha devolved into the separated Chinese worship of MA Kuan Yin, and how the merged attributes of MANI PADME remain in Japanese Buddhism today.  After describing ancient Japanese Pure Land, with its Catholic Mary / Benten, Alvar KANAN and Tana Bata Festival Rasa Lila etc. connections, i will touch on the popular HARI NAM movements of HRIH in Japan…to the present’s SOKKA phenomenon.  I will relate my experiances with P.L. Buddhism in Japan, and my initiation into NEMBUTSU  in the inner sanctum of the High Alter of ASAKUSA KANNON in Tokyo. Then i will finish with a description of the pre-Sakyamuni Buddhism beneath Sakyamuni Buddhism, in the ancient East (Bon in Tibet, Taoist Yab Yum / Purusha / Prakrti, Shinto Pantheon etc. ), and how this is related to Vaishnavism in both India and the Heliopolitan Federations of the Mediterranean.  Once i have outlined these connections, any army of scholars will be able to reconstruct my studies and flesh-out the entire framework of connections i have introduced in this short introduction to BUDDHISM in the context of World Emanational and Incarnational Monotheism.   Please forgive my run-on sentences, i can hardly sit up at this point and im failing fast / must quit for the day…so

HARI BOL !  LOVE LOVE AND MORE LATER,

your aspiring servant,  Bhakti Ananda